Page 281 - 第四屆原住民族傳統習慣規範與國家法制研討會論文集

參考文獻

國際公約

Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, G.A. Res. 61/295, U.N. Doc. A/Res/61/295 (Sept. 13,
2007)
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Dec. 16, 1966, U.N.T.S. 171, art. 27/999

外國判決

Arani v Public Trustee of New Zealand [1920] AC 198 (PC)
Campbell v. Hall (1774) 98 ER 848 (KB)
Clarke v Takamore [2010] 2 NZLR 525 (HC)
Kitok v. Sweden, Communication No. 197/1985, U.N. Doc. A/43/40 (1988)
Mullick v Mullick (1829) 1 Knapp 245
Proprietors of Parininihi Ki Waitotara Block v. Ngaruahine Iwi Authority [2004] 2 NZLR 201 (HC)
Public Trustee v Loasby (1908) 27 NZLR 806 (SC)
Sandra Lovelace v. Canada, Communication No. R.6/24, U.N. Doc. Supp. No. 40 (A/36/40) (1981)
Takamore v Clarke [2011] NZCA 587
Takamore v Clarke [2012] 1 NZLR 573
Te Weehi v. Regional Fisheries Officer [1986] 1 NZLR 680 (HC)

外文文獻

Ahrén, M., Indigenous Peoples' Culture, Customs, And Traditions And Customary Law - The Saami
People's Perspective, 21 ARIZ. J. INT'L & COMP. L. 63 (2004).
ANAYA, J. S., INDIGENOUS PEOPLES IN INTERNATIONAL LAW (2d ed.) (New York: Oxford University
Press, 2004).
Anaya, S. J., International Human Rights and Indigenous Peoples: The Move Toward the Multicultural
State, 21 ARIZ. J. INT'L & COMP. L. 13 (2004).
Benda-Beckmann, F. V., & Benda-Beckmann, K. V., The Dynamics of Change and Continuity in
Plural Legal Orders, 53-54 J. LEGAL PLURALISM & UNOFFICIAL L. 1 (2006).
Bennett, T.W., Legal Pluralism and the Family in South Africa: Lessons from Customary Law Reform,
25 EMORY INT'L L. REV. 1029 (2011).
Clopton, Z. D., Extraterritoriality and Extranationality: A Comparative Study, 23 DUKE J. COMP. &
INT'L L. 217 (2013).
Connolly, B., Non-State Justice Systems and The State: Proposals for a Recognition Typology, 38
CONN. L. REV. 239 (2005).
Griffiths, J., What is Legal Pluralism?, 24 J. LEGAL PLURALISM & UNOFFICIAL L. 1 (1986).
HALSBURY'S LAWS OF ENGLAND (4th ed., reissue, 1998) vol 12(1).
HOOKER, M. B., LEGAL PLURALISM: AN INTRODUCTION TO COLONIAL AND NEO-COLONIAL LAWS
(Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 1975).
Lerner, N., Religious and Legal Pluralism in Comparative Theoretical Perspective, 25 EMORY INT'L L.
REV. 829 (2011).
Lincoln, L., Takamore v Clarke: An Appropriate Approach to the Recognition of Maori Custom in New
Zealand Law? 44 VICT. U. WELLINGTON L. REV. 141 (2013).
MENSKI, W., COMPARATIVE LAW IN A GLOBAL CONTEXT (2d ed.) (Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press,
2006).
Merry, S. E., Legal Pluralism, 22 LAW & SOC'Y REV. 869 (1988).
Perry, R., Balancing Rights or Building Rights? Reconciling the Right to Use Customary Systems of
Law with Competing Human Rights in Pursuit of Indigenous Sovereignty, 24 HARV. HUM. RTS. J.
71 (2011).
Sloan, S., Accommodation and Rectification: A Dual Approach to Indigenous Peoples in International
277